No one would deny that film is an art, but what is film and what is art? At first glance, you may think that such a problem is quite minor. Who hasn't seen a movie yet, how could they not even know what it is? With our experience of watching movies and reading CDs alone, we can tell the story in detail. And for the question of what art is, as long as one is proficient in art theory or a certain art category of theory, they can definitely come up with some ideas. But is the problem really that simple? The numerous works on film theory and art theory may serve as evidence, but those who do not like theory always cite Dr. Faust's words in Goethe's "Faust" to refute that theory is gray. Spies in Disguise Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone eraserhead So let's first assume that those theories are just making sense. How can we face how movies with a history of only over a hundred years, without any theory, enter the palace of art from the grand land of "juggling"? The term "art" in English is mainly represented by "art", and the initial meaning of art was to refer to various different technologies (skills). According to British scholar Raymond Williams, the meaning of the term did not change until the late 18th and early 19th centuries, gradually forming the commonly adopted meaning of "generally related to (creative) and (imaginative)".